Microaggression and the Consumption of Poverty: A community's resistance to invasive walking tours in Vancouver's Downtown Eastside
Bibliographic record
Abstract
From 2014 to 2016, Jenn Potter ran a walking tour called Tours by Locals, leading hundreds of people through the poorest neighbourhood in Canada, Vancouver’s Downtown Eastside (DTES). This tour focused on what she described as social enterprises in the community and cost $185 per person. Though Potter ran this walking tour with the hope that it would lead to more understanding and compassion towards the neighbourhood and its residents, residents of the community and activists did not see it this way. In response to this tour, anti-gentrification activists held their own 'Yuppie Gazing Tour' down the streets of Vancouver yelling 'The Downtown Eastside isn't a safari, drive away in your Ferrari!' Though protests around Potter's walking tour led to its end, there are still an estimated 25 to 30 walking tours in the DTES today. Guides justify their presence in the DTES in various ways and treat tours as benign sources of education and entertainment for tour participants. Based on interviews with 13 walking tour guides and attendance in 13 walking tours in the DTES, this research argues that walking tours in the DTES are not benign and are, in fact, invasive poverty tours. Walking tours in the DTES contribute to a narrative that erases its residents' rights- based histories and continues a politics of dispossession and displacement. Poverty in the neighbourhood is both made a spectacle of and obscured during walking tours creating microaggressions against the DTES community. DTES residents are epistemically backgrounded– "both targeted and 'sub-merged,' both identifiable and indefensible...hidden in plain sight" (Dotson, 2017, p. 420). Community members are not bystanders or backdrops in this process. Through acts of microresistance and everyday resistance against walking tours, DTES residents make claims about their rights to the city. These forms of resistance presented against walking tours both nuance and challenge traditional understandings of how resistance is legitimized and preformed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".