MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7011358005

Machine Learning Approaches for Anomaly Detection and Load Forecasting in Smart Buildings Time Series Data

2024· other· en· W7011358005 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueSpectrum Research Repository (Concordia University) · 2024
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Studies and Exploration
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersConcordia University
KeywordsAnomaly detectionTime seriesArtificial neural networkFeature (linguistics)TrainResource (disambiguation)Building automationEnergy (signal processing)Key (lock)Big data
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The proliferation of IoT sensors in smart buildings has enabled extensive time-series data collection, providing valuable insights for predictive maintenance, operational efficiency, and energy management. This data can be used within an anomaly detection framework to automatically identify abnormal behaviors, enabling the detection of issues related to power consumption, control system failures, and sensor malfunctions. Additionally, it supports load forecasting, crucial for optimizing energy management by enabling efficient resource allocation, cost savings, and sustainable operations through accurate demand prediction. However, IoT devices are prone to issues like hardware malfunctions and transmission errors, which introduce data anomalies and complicate the effective use of collected data. A popular and effective anomaly detection framework trains autoencoders on minimizing the error between original and reconstructed sequences. By setting a threshold on the reconstruction error, abnormal sequences can be distinguished from the predominant regular patterns. However, this method is highly sensitive to architectural parameters and the nature of anomalies, making it difficult to develop a universally effective method or fine-tune a model without prior knowledge of the building and sensors settings. To address this, we propose a reinforcement learning-based neural architecture search approach to explore a manually defined search space and identify the optimal neural configuration through trial and error. While this method demonstrates competitive performance in discovering effective architectures that may be not intuitive, it assumes the availability of anomaly-free data for training, which is not practical in real-world scenarios. Hence, we also present an unsupervised feature bank-based model for anomaly detection in anomaly-contaminated time series. We integrate this with a recurrent denoising autoencoder, trained on data deemed anomaly-free, to replace identified anomalies with plausible patterns. This results in a combined anomaly detection and imputation pipeline that preprocesses data for downstream tasks, such as forecasting, in which we compare the performance of different models before and after preprocessing and demonstrate significant improvements. Despite these advancements, data scarcity remains a challenge in training effective load forecasting models for smart buildings, specially that concerns over the privacy of IoT sensor data make building owners reluctant to share their data, whether for transfer learning or for centralized model training, as it can reveal sensitive information about the occupants’ behaviors. To overcome this limitation, we introduce a federated load forecasting framework to exploit data from multiple buildings while maintaining data privacy. Acknowledging the diverse load profiles shaped by factors like size, location, and user behavior, we also investigate existing techniques to personalize the global model to accommodate each building’s specific characteristics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.156 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSpectrum Research Repository (Concordia University)→Same topicGeological Studies and Exploration→French-language works237,207→