MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7011383035

Mapping chromatin contacts in the human MYB locus

2016· dissertation· en· W7011383035 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2016
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhysics and Engineering Research Articles
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Cancer Society Research InstituteCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsChromatinChIA-PETCTCFMYBRegulation of gene expressionGene knockdownGene expressionGeneChromatin remodeling
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The MYB gene encodes for a transcription factor that has an important role in regulating normal hematopoietic proliferation and differentiation.Aberrant expression of this gene is strongly associated with leukemogenesis in humans.To better understand how this gene is regulated in leukemia, we studied the chromatin organization of the gene locus in the human acute myeloid leukemia cell line THP-1, and, in human embryona carcinoma cell line NT2D1.We observed a similar chromatin contact pattern between CTCF binding regions previously identified in mouse.Interestingly, the upstream region from the MYB gene forms a strong chromatin contact to its gene body rather than the promoter.In this upstream region, MLL binding is observed.Knockdown of MLL protein caused the repression of MYB gene expression and reduction of H3K4me1 marks surrounding the MYB gene locus.Our data suggest that the MLL protein is amongst the factors maintaining high-level MYB gene expression and its epigenetics states via chromatin organization.Based on our data, we propose that cancer cells mediate chromatin contacts around the MYB gene locus leading to its dysregulation.We observe no change in chromatin organization after induced cell differentiation despite the downregulation of MYB gene.For MLL associated leukemogenesis, our data brings new insight to the regulation of abnormal gene expression based on the context of chromatin organization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.361
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topicPhysics and Engineering Research ArticlesFrench-language works237,207