Mission impossible? Physical activity programming for individuals experiencing homelessness
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The homeless population is a vulnerable one, prone to physical, mental and social liabilities. Physical activity provides tangible physical health benefits as well as mental health and social benefits. There is some support that physical activity programs can provide the homeless with several of the necessary skills to become more independent and ultimately gain control of their lives. Participants included 18 men and two women accessing services from a local Mission. Eight reported exercising regularly in a gym setting (gym users group); 12 were not regularly active in a gym setting (comparison group). Participants completed the Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale, New General Self-Efficacy Scale, Exercise Behavior Questionnaire, Quality of Life Scale, and the PAR-Q. Body mass index was calculated. Participants completed a one-mile treadmill walk test, sit and reach measure, and a grip strength test. Finally, participants took part in a semi-structured interview that included questions about their history of physical activity participation, attitudes toward physical activity, knowledge seeking behaviour, and perceptions of social support for being physically active. The results indicated two variables were significantly different between the groups. The gym users had significantly better grip strength (M = 46.67 kg, SD = 2.64, p = .017) than the comparison group (M = 37.42 kg, SD = 2.26). The gym users were able to complete the one-mile walk faster (M = 15.36 minutes, SD = 2.99, p = .033) than the comparison group (M = 17.80 minutes, SD = 1.62). Correlation coefficients indicated participants with higher intention to exercise walked faster; participants with a more positive attitude to exercise had lower BMI’s; participants with higher perceived behavioural control had greater intention to be active. The interviews indicated the participants saw value in being physically active and provided insight into developing physical activity programs aimed at the needs of this population. Acknowledgments: University of Winnipeg Major Research Grant
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".