Midlife crisis may just be a myth
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Making it through midlife without a sports car or an affair may be the norm because it turns out most of us get happier with age rather than the reversMID LIFE MYTH http://www.newser.com/story/218894/what-midlife-crisis-most-of-us-get-happier.html Making it through midlife without a sports car or an affair may be the normbecause it turns out most of us get happier with age rather than the reverse. The fabled midlife crisis has been the topic of movies and books but the tales of the middle age change don't have a lot of support. After following two groups - High school seniors from ages 18 to 43 and college seniors from 23 to 37 - researchers at the University of Alberta found happiness levels increased as everyone hit their thirties. It dipped a bit around age 43 for the group of aging high schoolers - but newser.com reports out of both groups everyone still confessed to having more joy in their lives in their forties. The brains behind the findings say the approach to the study was important because to find out how people change as they age you need to follow the same people..... and the happier those middle agers means a better life for them and lower price tag on medical costs and society.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.151 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".