Melo Frazão, ilustrador (também) de António Torrado, e a renovação da edição portuguesa para a infância
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The present approach takes up and analyses five relevant children’s books by António Torrado (1939-) (one of them co-authored by Maria Alberta Menéres (1930-2019)), namely Hoje Há Palhaços (1976), Há Coisas Assim (1977), O Vizinho de Cima (1985), A Janela do Meu Relógio (1985), and Como se Vence um Gigante (1987), which have in common not only the fact of having been published in important series (“Caracol” and “a rã que ri” of Plátano Editora and “Sete estrelas” of Livros Horizonte), but also their illustrator: Fernando Melo Frazão (1932-1995). Our aim is to explain the meaning of this books in portuguese publishing panorama after Carnation Revolution (1974), taking into account the innovation of verbal text as well as visual construction, two discourses that have a semantic synergy. We attempt to elucidate some of the aesthetics singularities of Melo Frazão’s versatile, sensitive and very personal artistic work, as a fundamental contribution to the portuguese children’s literature/edition renovation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".