MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7011572460

Minimally invasive evaluation of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

2001· other· en· W7011572460 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueLibrary and Archives Canada (Government of Canada) · 2001
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHead and neck squamous-cell carcinomaLymph nodeHead and neckHead and neck cancerBasal cellOxygenationSentinel lymph nodeCancerLymphMicrovessel
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Head and neck cancer represent about 7% of all malignancies in North America, the majority of these tumors being squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) which metastasize to local and regional lymph nodes. In Manitoba, they cause over 70 deaths each year. The goal of the present study was to investigate and develop novel minimally invasive techniques that could allow enhanced evaluation and treatment of patients with head and neck SCC. Human and animal experiments in this study included measurements of tumor microvascularization using dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) and tumor oxygenation using blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) and compared them to tumor histology. The detection and identification of sentinel lymph nodes was also investigated. VX-2 tumors in rabbits demonstrated applicability of the DCE and BOLD techniques to a model of SCC. VX-2 tumors showed reduced contrast uptake and decreased oxygenation during development of central necrosis. In patients with SCC, size distribution of microvasculature was shown to be related to tumor recurrence and survival. DCE functions were related to microvessel size distribution, tumor size, and nodal status while BOLD oxygenation studies correlated with tumor microvasculature. Positive nodal status was correlated with a widened oxygenation distribution in the tumors. An MRI based interstitial lymphangiography (MRII,) method using a USPIO contrast agent was developed and proved comparable to the isosulfan blue method. MRIL provides significantly improved anatomic information compared to current sentinel node techniques. Overall, these minimally invasive techniques showed significant promise for enhancing the treatment of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.* *This dissertation includes a CD that is multimedia (contains text and other applications that are not available in a printed format). The CD requires the following applications: Windows 95/98, Microsoft Office, Internet Access, Corel Draw, Photoshop, Microsoft Photo Editor, Paint.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.173
Teacher spread0.165 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLibrary and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)→French-language works237,207→