32nd Annual Scientific Meeing of the EUBS, 23-26 August 2006, Bergen, Norway
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The 32 nd Annual Scientific Meeting of the European Underwater and Baromedical Society (EUBS) on Diving and Hyperbaric Medicine was held between 23 rd and 26 th August 2006 in Bergen, Norway.It was organised by the EUBS in collaboration with the Norwegian Baromedical Society and the Centre for Hyperbaric Medical Research in Bergen.Dr. Arvid Hope was the Secretary General of the Organizing Committee and prof.Einar Thorsen was the Secretary of the Scientific Committee.The National Center for Hyperbaric Medicine, Institute of Maritime and Tropical Medicine in Gdynia, Medical University of Gdańsk, participated in in this meeting.More than 200 registered representatives of 29 countries from Europe, as well as Canada, Japan, Russia, Israel and the USA, were participating in this event.There were 28 papers and 12 posters on diving topics and 10 papers and 19 posters on hyperbaric medicine topics presented at the EUBS meeting, including reports about diving equipment and environment, pressure and oxygen toxicity, decompression and VGE, diving medicine, hyperbaric oxygen therapy clinical studies, and hyperbaric oxygen therapy equipment and procedures.All presentations were interesting and any trial to choose the most useful or the most significant one could be influenced by the subjective bias of the reviewer.From all posters, the Conference Jury chose one for being outstanding in scope and relevance of subject matter.The award was presented to S. St. Leger-Dowse from UK, the first author of the poster, entitled "Relationship Between the Menstrual Cycle and Decompression Illness: Is the Evidence Building ?"The importance of the subject was also confirmed by the other poster entitled "Decompressions Sickness -The Female Style?An Observational Study" presented by C. M. Muth et al from Germany.Large statistics about disability and morbidity of professional divers in the UK, as well as the relationship between time to recompression treatment and clinical outcome for decompression illness treated in Scotland were presented by J. Ross.The French military group presented results of an experiment on "long duration immersion" in cold
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.279 | 0.099 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".