Models of Retinal Development and Disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
For a model of a human disease to be valid and useful, it is important that key genotypic and phenotypic traits are shared between model system and human. The work in this thesis has been focused on generating new and characterizing spontaneous models of three genetic disorders affecting the retina: retinoblastoma, a childhood cancer with its origin in the fetal retina, Stargardt disease, a juvenile form of macular degeneration, and Bardet-Biedl syndrome, a pleiotropic ciliopathy featuring retinal degeneration. In Paper I, we generated two novel models of MYCN-driven retinoblastoma, in developing chicken retinas and in human retinal organoids, in order to identify its cell of origin and to determine whether MYCN is sufficient in driving tumorigenesis. We found that MYCN was indeed sufficient and that the expression was uniquely tolerated by the cone and horizontal cell progenitor which survived and proliferated anachronistically. The results from our models are in alignment with observations that MYCN-driven retinoblastoma results in a more anaplastic and aggressive form of the cancer and we propose that the fate-restricted progenitor for cones and horizontal cells is its cell of origin. In Paper II, we analyzed the effects of a novel, spontaneous model of ABCA4-mediated Stargardt disease in Labrador retrievers and found that dogs homozygous for the mutation exhibited visual impairment and photoreceptor degeneration. Cone photoreceptors were scarce and the retinal pigment epithelium autofluorescent, indicative of lipofuscin accumulation, a hallmark of Stargardt disease. The phenotype and its etiology in this model are akin to human Stargardt disease. In Paper III, we investigated whether a spontaneous mutation in the TTC8 gene resulted in syndromic Bardet-Biedl syndrome in golden retrievers. We found that, in addition to progressive photoreceptor degeneration and visual impairment, the TTC8 mutation resulted in pleiotropic clinical signs of Bardet-Biedl syndrome with great inter-individual variation, congruent with Bardet-Biedl syndrome in humans. We find that the models described in this thesis are representative of the corresponding genetic disorders in human and that they could be of value for hypothesis generation (in chicken), experimental gene therapy (in dog), and as a human system to test pharmacological interventions (retinal organoids).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".