MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7011665995

"A NEED FOR A NEW KIND OF LAWYERING" TO BE THE TOPIC OF ANNUAL SIBLEY LECTURE

2002· article· en· W7011665995 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuePress Releases · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLegal Education and Practice Innovations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDeliberationPresentation (obstetrics)CommissionPoliticsLegal educationCritical legal studiesDispute resolutionPhilosophy of law
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Monday, March 25, 2002 WRITER: Heidi Murphy, 706/542-5172, hmurphy@uga.edu CONTACT: Paul Kurtz, 706/542-7140, pmkurtz@uga.edu "A NEED FOR A NEW KIND OF LAWYERING" TO BE THE TOPIC OF ANNUAL SIBLEY LECTURE ATHENS, Ga. - Professor of Law Carrie Menkel-Meadow will address the provocative topic of "A Need for a New Kind of Lawyering" for the new century in her presentation of the 94th Sibley Lecture to be held on Monday, April 1 at 3:30 p.m. in the law school's Hatton Lovejoy Courtroom. The lecture is open to the public. Admission is free. According to Menkel-Meadow, in a modern world of multiple parties and multiple issues within most legal and social problems, the lawyer's role must expand to incorporate new roles as mediators, consensus builders, facilitators, meeting managers and problem solvers. Drawing on such wide ranging sources as political theory (democratic deliberation and participation), game theory, popular culture (John Nash and A Beautiful Mind), literature (Ian McEwen's Enduring Love) and examples from actual legal practice, she will illustrate her point. Menkel-Meadow is professor at Georgetown University Law Center where she also directs the Georgetown-Hewlett Program on Conflict Resolution and Problem Solving and chairs the Georgetown-CPR Commission on Ethics and Standards in Alternative Dispute Resolution. She has written extensively in the fields of dispute resolution, legal ethics, feminist theory, legal education and the sociology of the legal profession. In addition to her scholarship, teaching and training, Menkel-Meadow is an active mediator and arbitrator and has trained mediators and lawyers throughout the U.S., Europe, South America, Australia and Japan. Menkel-Meadow holds a B.A. magna cum laude from Barnard College, Columbia University, a J.D. cum laude from the University of Pennsylvania and an LL.D. (Hon.) from Quinnipiac College of Law. Before joining the Georgetown faculty, she taught at UCLA, the University of Pennsylvania, Stanford and the University of Toronto. She has also been a visiting professor at Harvard University and Temple University. The Sibley Lecture Series, established in 1964 by the Charles Loridans Foundation of Atlanta in tribute to the late John A. Sibley, is designed to attract outstanding legal scholars of national prominence to the UGA School of Law. Sibley was a 1911 graduate of the law school. ##

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.688
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.106
GPT teacher head0.378
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it