Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The juvenile pluma~ed Yellowthroat is easily recognized: a small warbler, olive-green above and huffy below with rounded, short winf-S and tail, no white in tail, very narrow huffy wing-bars, short rictal bristles.It is now well known that the wing and tail quills are replaced at the post-juvenal molt.At this molt both sexes acquire the yellow areas of the underparts, and the nale, the black areas on the head.These black areas may be somewhat obscured by gray ed~ings or be as black as in the breeding plumage.We may safely conclude that a fall Yellowthroat without black on the head is a female.This summer I noted that some juveniles had the ramal area (see sketch) black rather than brown.There were ei~ht of those while 22 had the area brown.One, here rCI1l1c:.\lcounted as brown, wa:s intermediate.Of these birds, four areCL reappeared late enough for the sex to be checked.Two, recorded with black ramal areas, were males.The other two were females and their ramal areas, before molt, had been recorded as brown.Four birds are too few to prove that the rule is invariable, but here is another point for banders to observe.The post.iuvenal molt of this species occurs mostly in August and seems to be relatively slow, P.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it