MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7011850740

A novel postsynaptic role for DDC in synaptic plasticity in the adult mammalian hippocampus

2014· dissertation· en· W7011850740 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2014
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBlind Source Separation Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMcGill University
KeywordsDendritic spinePostsynaptic potentialSynapseHippocampal formationDeleted in Colorectal CancerHippocampusSynaptic plasticityBiological neural networkNeuronNeuroplasticity
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

While it is well known that netrin-1 and its receptor Deleted in Colorectal Cancer (DCC) are essential for normal neural development, it remains unclear why their expression persists in the adult nervous system. We have recently demonstrated that DCC is expressed at synapses in the mature mammalian brain and that it regulates synapse function and plasticity. The precise pre- and post-synaptic functions of DCC at established synapses in the adult is not yet understood. To study the specific post-synaptic role of DCC, we generated R4ag11::Cre/DCC floxed mice in which DCC expression is selectively eliminated from CA1 hippocampal pyramidal neurons once early development has been completed, while DCC expression in the pre-synaptic neurons of the adjacent CA3 region remained intact. This conditional loss of DCC from the CA3-CA1 post-synaptic neuron resulted in abnormal dendritic spine morphology in CA1 neurons in aging mice despite maintaining overall organization and spine density. Post-synaptic DCC deficiency in these transgenic animals also resulted in deficits in spatial memory and novel place recognition tasks but failed to disrupt novel object recognition memory, suggesting that selective deletion of DCC in CA1 neurons results in disturbances in the neural circuits underlying contextual spatial memory. Together, these findings provide evidence for a critical post-synaptic role for DCC in adult mice and that DCC contributes to memory consolidation during spatial navigation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.099
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0030.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topicBlind Source Separation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207