Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
RESEARCH BACKGROUND\n'Constellations: A large number of small drawings' coincided with the 'Drawing Out' conference organized by RMIT University and University of Arts London. Work was selected from artists and designers working in diverse disciplines, and ranged from schematic studies to exquisite drawings of high artistic merit, from preparatory sketches to professional plans. The architectural drawings exhibited, from different styles and periods, ranged from older, beautifully-rendered drawings to contemporary mind maps, from hand-drawn images to computer-assisted designs.\n\nRESEARCH CONTRIBUTION\nFar Is Near tests an alternative mapping technique consisting of abstract forms of representation at different scales, both 'far' and 'near'. These drawings, which document essential conditions of a site and translate them from their natural situation into a new, more artificial state, are an investigation into the evocative, as both a pre-design reference and an influence on the design process. Specifically, they are analytical studies of the vegetation patterns that inform the existing site, and they investigate the role that the vegetation may have in relation to the design by documenting its constitutive natural elements at both a large territorial and close scale, through aerial mapping of the territorial context and translation of the physical and material qualities of the natural ground into an abstract sublimation of its essential, somehow embryonic character.\n\nRESEARCH SIGNIFICANCE\nSome twenty architects were represented, including Gregory Burgess, Barrie Marshall, Howard Raggatt, Frederick Romberg, Peter Elliott, and Leon van Schaik. The exhibition, which was sponsored by the Department of Innovation, Industry, Science and Research, also showed works by artists from the UK, South Korea, Australia, New Zealand, Sweden and China. A second Drawing Out conference will be held in London in 2012.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.031 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it