Bibliographic record
Abstract
This book is impressive on a number of different levels, including significance, originality, research quality and overall strength of argument.The scope of analysis is broadly based, extending over the entire period from World War I through the Dprssion years and on to World War II, and exploring the complex relationships that informed public policy, family and gender rles.Dr. Christie's research is founded on a wide variety of historical documents, manuscript and printed, and although many of her arguments are spcifie to Canada she does not hesitate to range more widely into comparative history.At various stages of the book, moreover, the author brings her diverse sources together to reflect on the significance of each piece of the puzzle to the larger picture of family and social power.While she is aware of the lacunae in her own research, Dr. Christie reveals an unusual ability to balance powerful analy sis and insight into family relations with a well informed grasp of abundant secondary sources.Dr. Christie chronicles carefully the graduai defeat of the Victorian maternai feminist idal of family in the face of a rsurgent patriarchy born of two world wars and the Dprssions years, and in so doing exposes the patriarchal underpinnings of the 'breadwinner idal' of Canadian social policy.Engendering the State substantially enriches our understanding of the ways in which the state intruded into, and ultimately shaped, fundamental concepts of social policy, family and gender.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".