Bibliographic record
Abstract
This show marks a stage in ongoing visual research using ideas of getting from A to B, the pit falls, non-starters and spaces we move through to get there. It was sponsored by the BC Arts Council and the Canadian Council for the Arts. The spaces are known and unknown, showing the interruptions and changes that can occur. Ogilvie has been developing these ideas since 2002, while working as a visiting artist/lecturer at Minneapolis College of Art and design. The work was shown in Vancouver at the Malaspina Gallery at the end of 2004, in an exhibition of prints and wall mounted cut outs called,’ Hither and Thither’. Ogilvie was the international resident artist (2 artists per year are panel selected for the solo show/residency programme), where she spent one month working in lithography and two weeks traveling to Vancouver Island. As well as the solo exhibition Ogilvie made slide lecture/presentations based on her practice to members and associates of the Malaspina Print Society and also at the University of British Columbia to staff and students in the Department of Visual Art. Further research involved experimentation with multimedia following training development at ISIS Arts, New media studio, Newcastle in August 2006, from which she developed a short Director animation using drawings related to the Hither and Thither work. Other associated exhibitions which have shown pieces from this body of work include -'Through a Child’s Eye', Edinburgh Printmakers, 2005, 'Impressions', invited group show,The RBSA Gallery, Birmingham, 2005, 'Making a Mark', Northern Print Gallery, 2006, ‘Stone•Plate•Grease•Water’, Y Taberncl – Museum for Modern art Wales, Machynlleth, 2007 Internationale grafik triennale, Vienna Künstlerhaus 2007. Reveiws of the work included; ‘Arts & Life, Queue, The Vancouver Sun,16.9.04 ‘Preview, the gallery guide- Alberta, BC, Oregon, Washington’, Sept/Oct Chop Newsletter,’Sara Ogilvie: A Review,’ - Catherine Stewart.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.237 | 0.059 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".