MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7014103465

The outcomes of acute palliative care unit at a comprehensive cancer center

2020· dissertation· en· W7014103465 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueYUHSpace (Yonsei University Medical Library) · 2020
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPalliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPalliative careCancerAcute hospitalPsychosocialAcute carePsychological interventionUnit (ring theory)Distress
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Acute palliative care units aim to actively control physical and psychosocial distress of advanced cancer patients and their families. They also help patients receive the care they need by connecting them to adequate facilities. Our interest was to retrospectively analyze the admission results of patients who utilized the acute palliative care unit of the Yonsei Cancer Center and look forward to finding effective ways to operate the acute palliative care unit. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The admission data between April 2014 and April 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Two hundred and five patients used the acute palliative care unit for a total of 289 admissions. Medication changes and interventions during the acute palliative care unit stay were investigated. The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System was used to estimate symptom severity initially at admission and one week afterwards to check how much the symptom severity was lowered. Differences between deceased and alive discharged patients were also compared. RESULTS: The 205 admitted patients had the following characteristics: male 53.2%, median age 60 years (range 53-69), and median acute palliative care unit stay 9 days (range 5.0-14.0). Hepatobiliary-pancreatic cancer and gastrointestinal cancer patients accounted for the largest portion (n=72, 35.1%; n=42, 20.5% respectively). Most patients were referred from department of oncology (n=166, 81%). One hundred and fifty-eight (77.1%) patients were referred to the acute palliative care unit after anti-cancer treatments were all finished. Forty-six (22.4%) patients died during their stay. Patients who were discharged due to death were most likely admitted from other wards (n=31, p=0.0006) and were finished with anti-cancer treatment before admission (n=42, p=0.0009). There was a significant improvement in ESAS scores for fatigue, lack of appetite, dyspnea, constipation, and depression, but pain was not controlled significantly. Forty patients requiring ongoing treatment were well-linked to hospices. CONCLUSION: Most patients admitted to the acute palliative care unit at the Yonsei Cancer Center were at the end stages of their disease or finished with their anti-cancer treatments. Overall symptoms improved with some drawbacks during the acute palliative care unit stay. To improve acute palliative care unit�셲 role, a more aggressive symptom management and a system for early access are necessary.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.639
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.372
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it