MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7014457243

PERBEDAAN PENGARUH LATIHAN ISOMETRIC
\nOTOT QUADRICEPS DAN LATIHAN CLOSED KINETIC
\nCHAIN TERHADAP PENINGKATAN AKTIVITAS
\nFUNGSIONAL PADA PENDERITA
\nOSTEOARTHRITIS KNEE

2018· dissertation· id· W7014457243 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDIGILIB at Universitas 'Aisyiyah Yogyakarta (UNISA) (Universitas 'Aisyiyah Yogyakarta) · 2018
Typedissertation
Languageid
FieldHealth Professions
TopicSports and Physical Education Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOsteoarthritisIsometric exerciseTotal knee arthroplasty
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Latar Belakang: Meningkatnya jumlah lansia terjadi peningkatan jumlah usia harapan \nhidup, dimana pada lansia telah mengalami degenaratif atau fungsi penurunan \nstruktur tubuh, yang banyak terjadi yaitu osteoarthritis knee menyebabkan lansia \nmengalami penurunan dalam aktivitas fungsionalnya sehingga menghambat dalam \nmelakukan aktivitas sehari-hari.Tujuan: Untuk mengetahui perbedaan pengaruh \nlatihan isometric otot quadriceps dan latihan closed kinetic chain terhadap \npeningkatan aktivitas fungsional pada penderita osteoarthritis knee . Metode: \nPenelitian ini merupakan quasi experimental randomized pre test and post test \ntwo group design sebanyak 16 orang penderita osteoarthritis knee. Sampel dibagi \nmenjadi 2 kelompok yaitu kelompok I mendapat perlakuan latihan isometric otot \nquadriceps, kelompok II mendapat perlakuan latihan closed kinetic chain , \nkeduanya dilakukan 3 kali seminggu selama 4 minggu. Alat ukur dalam \npenelitian kemampuan fungsional Western Ontario and Mcmaster Universities \nOsteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) . Uji normalitas data menggunakan uji shapiro wilktest \ndan uji homogenitas data menggunakan l avene’ test. Penggunaan Paired \nsamples t-test untuk mengetahui peningkatan aktivitas fungsional pada kelompok I \ndan II serta menggunakan Independent samples t-test untuk menguji perbedaan \npengaruh hasil intervensi kelompok I dan II. Hasil: Hasil uji menggunakan Paired \nsamples t-test pada kelompok I p=0,000 (p<0,05) dan pada kelompok II p=0,000 \n(p<0,05) menunjukkan bahwa kedua perlakuan berpengaruh terhadap peningkatan \naktivitas fungsional pada penderita osteoarthritis knee, Sedangkan perbedaan \npengaruh menggunakan Indepndent samples t-test p=0,011 (p<0,05) menunjukkan \nbahwa kedua perlakuan memiliki perbedaan pengaruh yang signifikan terhadap \npeningkatan aktivitas fungsional pada penderita osteoarhritis knee. Kesimpulan: \nAda perbedaan pengaruh latihan isometric otot quadriceps dan latihan closed kinetic \nchain terhadap peningkatan aktivitas fungsional pada penderita osteoarthritis knee. \nSaran: Peneliti selanjutnya untuk melakukan penelitian lebih spesifik dan dapat \nmengontrol aktivitas subjek penelitian yang berbeda-beda diluar waktu perlakuan \nyang dapat mempengaruhi hasil penelitian.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.095

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0280.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDIGILIB at Universitas 'Aisyiyah Yogyakarta (UNISA) (Universitas 'Aisyiyah Yogyakarta)Same topicSports and Physical Education ResearchFrench-language works237,207