PERCEPCIÓN DE LOS RESIDENTES SOBRE EL IMPACTO DEL MUNDOBASKET 2014 EN GRAN CANARIA Y APOYO A LA CELEBRACIÓN DE EVENTOS DEPORTIVOS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El objetivo de este trabajo es analizar la percepción de los residentes en Gran Canaria sobre el impacto del Mundobasket (2014) y su predisposición apoyar la celebración de eventos deportivos en la isla. Se recogió una muestra de 342 residentes que contestaron una encuesta de 41 ítems. Los resultados ermitieron agrupar en cuatro factores los beneficios percibidos y en tres los costes. Los beneficios en la imagen y el reconocimiento de la ciudad fueron los más destacados, mientras que señalaron los costes en la vida diaria como principal impacto negativo. Asimismo, se constató que los residentes apoyan la celebración de futuros eventos deportivos en la isla. Por último, los beneficios percibidos en la imagen y el reconocimiento internacional, en los aspectos socioeconómicos y socioculturales y deportivos, en sentido positivo, predicen la predisposición a apoyar la celebración de eventos deportivos The aim of this work is to analyse the perception of Gran Canaria (Spain) resident ?s about the impact of Mundobasket (2014) and their predisposition to support the celebration of sport events on the island. A sample of 342 residents filled in 41 items questionnaire. Results showed that perceived benefits cluster in four different dimensions, while costs in three dimensions. The benefits in image and the city recognition showed the most salient positive results, while the worst negative impact was represented by the costs in the every-day life. Therefore, it was concluded that residents support the celebration of future sport events on the island. To conclude, the perceived benefits in image and the international recognition in socioeconomic, sociocultural and sport aspects,predict the predisposition to support sport events celebration in a positive way.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".