Quarterly report on sexually transmitted infections - Quarter 1, 2001
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The data in this report is provisional and will not be regarded as final until all returns are received and data has been validated urethritis, Pediculosis pubis, syphilis and trichomoniasis.This list of notifiable STIs was updated in January 2004 (Infectious Diseases (Amendment) (No. 3) Regulations 2003, S.I.No. 707 of 2003), however this report details the 14 STIs that were notifiable during 2002.Aggregate data on the number of notified STIs from Departments of Public Health is collated quarterly.Departments of Public Health are notified of STIs mostly from STI clinics and some GPs.The number of STIs notified by quarter, health board, age group and gender for quarter 2 (Q2) 2002 is presented in this report.Rates per 100,000 population are based on the 2002 population census, unless otherwise stated and are reported in appendix A. It should be noted that cases of infectious hepatitis B that are sexually transmitted may also be reported through the weekly infectious disease report published by NDSC.Please note that quarterly STI data is only available from Q1 1995 & annual STI data is only available from 1989. NDSC would like to thank all those who provided data for this report, particularly the STI Clinics, GPs and Departments of Public Health. Summary The total number of notified STIs has increased by 10.9% in Q2 2002, compared to the same quarter in 2001. The three most commonly notified STIs in Q2 2002 were ano-genital warts, non-specific urethritis and C. trachomatis (as in Q1 2002). The highest increases recorded during Q2 2002, compared to Q2 2001 were for trichomoniasis, genital herpes simplex and candidiasis. The most significant decreases reported during Q2 2002, compared to Q2 2001 were for gonorrhoea and P. pubis (as in Q1 2002).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".