MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7014775098

Prenatal and early childhood antibiotic exposure and the risk of neurodevelopmental disorders

2019· dissertation· en· W7014775098 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMspace (University of Manitoba) · 2019
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGut microbiota and health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCohortCohort studySiblingPopulationAutismAutism spectrum disorderAntibioticsProportional hazards model
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Early life changes in microbiota composition as a result of antibiotic exposure potentially impair brain development and increase the risk of neurodevelopmental disorders. In this project, I examined the association of antibiotic exposure during the first year of life and prenatal antibiotic exposure with the risk of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Methods: A population-based cohort study was conducted which included children born in Manitoba, Canada between the fiscal years 1998 and 2016/2017 and utilized administrative databases in Manitoba. Exposure was defined as having filled one or more antibiotic prescriptions during the first year of life or pregnancy. The outcome was ASD or ADHD diagnosis identified in hospital abstracts, physician visits, drug dispensations or educational special needs funding data. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate the risk of ASD or ADHD in the entire population and a sibling cohort. The risk of ADHD was additionally estimated in a high dimensional propensity score (HDPS)-matched cohort. Results: In a cohort of 214 834 children, antibiotic use in the first year of life was associated with a small reduction in ASD risk (Hazard ratio [HR] 0.91, 95% CI 0.84-0.99) but this was not observed in the sibling cohort (HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.86-1.23). Prenatal antibiotic exposure was associated with a small increase in ASD risk in the overall cohort (HR 1.10, 95% CI 1.01-1.19) and in the sibling cohort (HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.90-1.30). In a cohort of 187 605 children, antibiotic exposure in the first year of life was not associated with ADHD risk in the HDPS-matched cohort (HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.97-1.08) and in the sibling cohort (HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.89-1.03). Prenatal antibiotic exposure was associated with increased ADHD risk in the HDPS-matched cohort (HR 1.22, 95% CI 1.17-1.27) but the risk was attenuated in the sibling cohort (HR 1.06, 95% CI 0.99 - 1.13). Conclusions: No association was observed between antibiotic exposure in the first year of life and ASD or ADHD risk. In addition, no clinically-significant association was observed between prenatal antibiotic exposure and ASD or ADHD risk.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.086
Threshold uncertainty score0.171

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.172
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMspace (University of Manitoba)→Same topicGut microbiota and health→French-language works237,207→