Relational engagement at the intersection of personal and professional identities: A phenomenological exploration of the experience of Christian therapists
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Though Christian spirituality and therapeutic relationships are unique subjects, commonly found throughout literature pertaining to each topic is an emphasis on how people ought to approach and participate in relationship with one another. In other words, each subject represents a unique tradition of relational engagement. For therapists who practice Christian spirituality, it is possible, if not likely, that both traditions impact how they go about engaging with clients. Despite this, there is a lack of material exploring the experience of relational engagement when these traditions intersect. For this reason, I set out to explore what this experience is like for Christian therapists. Using concepts found within Relational Theory as a guide, this study employed a hermeneutic phenomenological framework to gather and process information. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with twenty Christian therapists across the province of Ontario, Canada, to learn more about this experience. Findings from the study suggest that this experience is fluid, complex, and made up of several “structures” that interact with, impact, and are impacted by each other. These include the personal and professional identities of Christian therapists, whether and how such identities are integrated, as well as several relational actions and relational perceptions. Based on this, the following recommendations are made. First, that counsellor educators encourage students to reflect on their personal and professional identities and whether and how they are integrated. Second, that therapists similarly reflect on the intersection of their personal and professional identities and how it impacts their relational engagement with clients. Finally, that clinical supervisors support supervisees in considering how their personal identities impact their approaches to, and experiences of, relational engagement in professional settings.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.011 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.029 | 0.040 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.010 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.014 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".