Properties of Polyol Esters for Low GWP Refrigerants
Bibliographic record
Abstract
HFC (Hydrofluorocarbon) refrigerants, whose ODP (Ozone Depletion Potential) is 0, are used in refrigeration and air conditioning equipments recently. It is known that HFCs are high GWP (Global Warming Potential) refrigerants. In October 2016, Kigali Amendment to the Montreal Protocol was stated to achieve the phase-down of HFC refrigerants to prevent global warming. Transition of current HFCs to low GWP refrigerants would be accelerated around the world. HFO (Hydrofluoroolefin) refrigerants such as R1234yf, R1234ze etc. are low GWP refrigerants. Refrigerant manufacturers are introducing not only HFO itself, but also mixture of HFC and HFO. HFO is known to be less chemically stable compared to HFC since there is double bond in its molecular structure. Also, HFOs tend to dissolve well with refrigeration oil compared to HFCs. As a result, amount of refrigerant dissolving in the oil increase and the kinematic viscosity of the oil decrease. We investigated ways to solve problems which may occur by using HFOs. In particular, it is important to maintain the stability and lubricity of oil. To improve stability, we optimized the amount of the stabilizer. To improve lubricity, since the kinematic viscosity of the oil decrease because the refrigerant dissolve in the oil more than necessary, we applied original base oil formulation to prevent the refrigerant from dissolving too much to the oil. In the presentation, properties of POE refrigeration oils which solve problems of low GWP refrigerants by investigating appropriate base oil and additive formulation are introduced.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".