MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7014998351

A Return to Learning: Re-kindling Education's Love of Learning for Schools of the Future

2021· other· en· W7014998351 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOCAD University Open Research Repository (OCAD University) · 2021
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFutures studiesWonderParadigm shiftInstitutionIndigenousRelevance (law)OrthodoxyIdeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Education continues to be a well-researched topic and the importance to reimagine schools of the future could not be a more pressing concern than it is today. As critical tensions steeply arise, such as climate change, systemic inequities, or digital ethics, we must wonder whether the present education system is adequately preparing children for the critical uncertainties of today and of tomorrow. And, as the Ontario education system is facing unprecedented circumstances with the unearthing of thousands of Indigenous children beneath Canadian residential schools, and the school disruptions caused by the COVID-19 global pandemic, the fragility and declining relevance of the institution is being exposed. \n \nInstead of a prescriptive approach on specific strategies and policies that could take place, this study focuses on creatively re-imagining schools of the future through systems analysis frameworks to identify levers of change, paired with a foresight approach utilizing the Three Horizons framework. To inform, validate, and challenge these frameworks, an ongoing literature review took place over the duration of the study, and a small sample size of education system actors was interviewed and invited to participate in a foresight workshop. Together, these efforts aim to explore a response to the question: How might we shift our paradigm of education to chart a pathway forward to re-imagined schools of the future? \n \nA lever of change worth exploring, which is the focal point of this study, is education orthodoxy across system actors. I explore how a shift in fundamental education ideology could have a drastic impact on the education system, possibly producing a preferred future. While I propose that an ideological shift can have far reaching ramifications, I acknowledge that it must be matched with other systemic interventions, but that changing the way we think about education is certainly a critical starting point.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.158

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0180.080
Scholarly communication0.0210.029
Open science0.0020.014
Research integrity0.0050.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOCAD University Open Research Repository (OCAD University)French-language works237,207