MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7015047094

Robinson, Marilyn (audio interview #1 of 2)

2019· other· en· W7015047094 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueJohn Spoor Broome Library Institutional Repository (California State University) · 2019
Typeother
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAmerican Sports and Literature
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRacismIndian cultureClubPromotion (chess)FeelingIndian countrySubject (documents)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SUBJECT BIO - Marilyn Robinson was actively involved in promoting American Indian Studies at several campuses, including UCLA, and an active participant in Indian women's organizations. A Mohawk-Cayuga woman, she was raised on the Six Nations Indian Reserve in southern Ontario, Canada in a family that honored that their native traditions and practices. Although her primary education was on the reserve, she had to leave in order to attend high school and college, where she experienced a great deal of racism. During the 1950s, after her marriage to a non-Indian, she stayed at home and raised her children. When she moved to San Diego in 1961, she became an activist and joined several Indian groups, including United Indian Women's Council. She returned to college to pursue an advanced degree, taught sociology and American Indian Studies, but became involved in advocacy of Indian causes - particularly promotion of education - and did not complete her Ph.D. \n \nTOPICS - family life on the reservation; childhood; high school in White community; racism; social life; religion; transition from reservation to high school in town; and role models; teaching on the reservation; first marriage; sibling relationships; role as wife of an academician; socializing among wives; and children;

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.127
Threshold uncertainty score0.426

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1270.026

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.161
Teacher spread0.153 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJohn Spoor Broome Library Institutional Repository (California State University)Same topicAmerican Sports and LiteratureFrench-language works237,207