MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7015155244

Rising Importance of Railways in the Eurasian Geopolitics: Potential Advantages and Risks

2024· other· en· W7015155244 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueSocial Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences) · 2024
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChinaTrainGeopoliticsTRIPS architectureQuarter (Canadian coin)Freight trainsWater transportTransportation infrastructure
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Railways are becoming more important in geopolitics as a result of technological developments and the economic rise of Asian countries. Global trade is flowing from east to west as a result of the economic growth of China, which opens up new geopolitical opportunities in the Eurasian region. In 2013, with the announcement of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), projects and routes based on the Northern, Middle and Southern Corridors were developed. Railway transport has become an increasingly popular option in recent years as it is cheaper than air transport and shorter than maritime transport. Freight rail transport between China and Europe continued to grow during the Covid19 epidemic, reaching 222 cities in 25 European countries. Thus, with the development of rail transport, history has returned to the historical Silk Road route and has been created new geopolitical opportunities for Eurasia. In 2011, there were 17 train services between China and Europe. In 2020, the number of China-Europe freight train trips exceeded 10,000, with 4,541 trips in the first quarter of this year, up 9 per cent year-on-year. Additionally, China has begun manufacturing high-speed freight trains for the first time in the world, making high-speed freight train transportation more attractive. While railways and the BRI create potential advantages for the Eurasian geography, on the other hand, they also contain potential risks in the Eurasian geography. Especially with the outbreak of conflicts between Russia and Ukraine, problems in the Northern Corridor have come to light. On the other hand, there are various protocol and capacity problems regarding the functionality of the Middle Corridor. Furthermore, Central Asia faces various risks such as radical terrorism, coup attempts and color revolutions. Eurasian geography is predominantly terrestrial and railways are of vital importance as Eurasia acts as a bridge for the trade flowing from east to west. Although railways contribute to Eurasia's global geopolitics, their risks should also be considered. This article’s main objective is to assess the rising importance of railways in Eurasian geopolitics and the potential advantages and risks in the Northern Corridor and Middle Corridor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.005
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.105
GPT teacher head0.463
Teacher spread0.358 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSocial Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences)French-language works237,207