Studies in the History of Southern Mesopotamia in Early Antiquity (from the 7th to the middle of the 2nd millennium ВС)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Книга предлагает читателю вариант исторической реконструкции социальных инсти- \nтутов, хозяйственных и политических структур Южной Месопотамии и соседних терри- \nторий в период ранней древности. Именно в это время в ходе взаимодействия различных \nкультурно-хозяйственных этнических групп здесь возникли самые ранние формы организации \nжизни и труда человеческих сообществ в рамках больших городов, были созданы \nсистемы управления этими сообществами, возникла письменность, были разработаны \nи записаны первые в истории человечества сборники законов. Исследование основано на \nтщательном изучении богатой научной литературы, многочисленных эпиграфических \nпамятников (шумерских и аккадских клинописных текстов), памятников материальной \nкультуры и данных археологических раскопок. / The book provides a historical reconstruction of the social institutions, economic and political \nstructures of Southern Mesopotamia and its neighbours in Early Antiquity. The period was marked \nby dynamic interactions of the different ethnic groups with different cultural and economical \nbackground which culminated in creating the earliest forms of life and labour organization in the \ncity-states along with the first systems of government, the appearance of written language and \nwriting down the first law collections. The study relies on exhaustive research of the numerous \nepigraphic evidences (Sumerian and Akkadian cuneiform texts), excavated artifacts and the interpretation \nof the archaeological record as a whole. The book is accessible to a wider audience, \nwhile it also provides a wealth of new material to the specialist in the field.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".