MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7015214900

Screening of cognitive dysfunction in outpatients with major depressive disorder and its associated factors in Hospital Selayang / Husni Zaim Ab Latiff

2019· article· en· W7015214900 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUiTM Institutional Repositories (Universiti Teknologi MARA) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTreatment of Major Depression
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMajor depressive disorderLogistic regressionDepression (economics)CognitionUnivariate analysisMini-international neuropsychiatric interviewMajor depressive episodePsychiatric interviewDepressive symptoms
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is a significant mental health problem worldwide. Cognitive dysfunction (CD) is frequently observed both during acute episode and as residual symptom of MDD. It as a predominant symptom of MDD, contributing to impairment of social and occupational functioning. Objective: General objective of this study was to assess and describe CD amongst adult patients with MDD under psychiatric clinic follow up at Hospital Selayang. Specific objectives were to determine the prevalence of CD among MDD in study population, to compare the sociodemographic and clinical profiles, to determine the domains of cognition mostly affected and the factor(s) associated with CD among study population. Methodology: This was a cross-sectional study involving MDD patients attending psychiatric clinic in Hospital Selayang, who were recruited through systematic random sampling. Those who fulfilled the selection criteria and gave informed consent were selected. Sociodemographic data was obtained from the patients. Clinical data was obtained from clinical notes. Confirmation of MDD was done using Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I 7.0). Screening for CD was done using Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Descriptive analysis was performed, followed by univariate analysis and multiple logistic regression analysis. Results: Of the total 245 participants, 32.7% (n=80, 95% CI: 26.7, 38.6) patients with MDD had CD. From multiple logistic regression, presence of CD amongst MDD patient was significantly associated with secondary education level and lower (OR: 6.09; 95% CI: 2.82, 13.16; p<0.001), five or more depressive episodes (OR: 8.93; 95% CI: 3.24, 24.67; p<0.001), treatment non-compliance (OR: 3.48; 95% CI: 1.40, 6.59; p=0.003), and presence of medical comorbidity (OR: 2.74; 95% CI: 1.46, 5.18; p=0.002). Conclusion: CD is prevalent among patients with MDD in Hospital Selayang. Having low education level, five or more episodes of depression, treatment non-compliance, and medical comorbidity strongly associated to CD amongst MDD patients. Hence, clinician need to be cognisant of CD and its associated factors in the treatment of the MDD patients. Its routine assessment possibly warranted in clinical setting.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUiTM Institutional Repositories (Universiti Teknologi MARA)Same topicTreatment of Major DepressionFrench-language works237,207