MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7015254236

Standard urotherapy conducted as group therapy: The voiding class.

2022· other· en· W7015254236 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueGhent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) · 2022
Typeother
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUrinary Bladder and Prostate Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnuresisQuality of life (healthcare)Urinary incontinenceCohortProspective cohort studyUrinary systemCohort study
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: Standard urotherapy is first-line treatment for LUTS in functional disorders. The study investigates effectiveness of group therapy or voiding class on symptom reduction and quality of life in children with LUTS. Patients and methods: A prospective cohort study is conducted including children, aged five to twelve, with LUTS. Voiding class takes place four weeks after recruitment and is followed with a follow-up consultation eight weeks after voiding class. During voiding class children receive standard urotherapy following ICCS guidelines in groups of four children. Data is collected before and after voiding class through a frequency-volume chart for three days, a bladder diary for fourteen nights and the validated Dutch Vancouver Symptom Score for Dysfunctional Elimination Syndrome (VSSDES) and Pediatric urinary incontinence Quality of life (PIN-Q) questionnaires. Adherence was evaluated by means of the amount of documents filled in before and after voiding class. Results: The study will be conducted between 2021 and 2023 and is therefore still ongoing. Twenty-four children have completed the voiding class and follow-up period. Children had a mean age of 7,43 years old and 75 % of them were male. Twelve children had combined daytime incontinence and enuresis, eleven children had isolated enuresis and one child had isolated daytime incontinence. Eight weeks after voiding class a statistically significant decrease in the VSSDES (p = 0.04) and adherence (p = 0.01) was found. Bladder capacity tended to increase although not statistically significant (p = 0.18). No changes concerning quality of life were seen on group level, although on individual level some children demonstrated a decrease in quality of life whereas others demonstrated an increase in quality of life. Conclusions: Preliminary results demonstrate effectiveness of group standard urotherapy. However, a high individual variability and low adherence was noted in the present study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.047

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGhent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University)Same topicUrinary Bladder and Prostate ResearchFrench-language works237,207