[Review] Carol R. Ember and Melvin Ember (2001) Cross-cultural research methods; Michael Burawoy, et al (2001) Global ethnography; Jürgen H. P. Hoffmeyer-Zlotnik and Christof Wolf, ed. (2003) Advances in cross-national comparison: a European working book for demographic and socio-economic variables; James Mahoney and Dietrich Rueschemeyer, eds. (2003) Comparative historical analysis in the social sciences
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Review of: Ember, C.R. and Ember, M., 2001. Cross-Cultural Research Methods. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press (Rowman and Littlefield), 171 pp., ISBN 9780759112001. Burawoy, M., et al., 2001. Global Ethnography: Forces, Connections, and Imaginations in a Postmodern World. London: University of California Press, 401 pp., ISBN 9780520222168. Hoffmeyer-Zlotnik, J.H.P. and Wolf, C. (eds.), 2003. Advances in Cross-National Comparison: A European Working Book for Demographic and Socio-Economic Variables. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, 422 pp., ISBN 9780306477317. Mahoney, J. and Rueschemeyer, D. (eds.), 2003. Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 458 pp., ISBN 9780521016452.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it