Statistical Methods for Complex and/or High Dimensional Data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This dissertation focuses on the development and implementation of statistical methods for high-dimensional and/or complex data, with an emphasis on $p$, the number of explanatory variables, larger than $n$, the number of observations, the ratio of $p/n$ tending to a finite number, and data with outlier observations. \n \nFirst, we propose a non-negative feature selection and/or feature grouping (nnFSG) method. It deals with a general series of sign-constrained high-dimensional regression problems, which allows the regression coefficients to carry a structure of disjoint homogeneity, including sparsity as a special case. To solve the resulting non-convex optimization problem, we provide an algorithm that incorporates the difference of convex programming, augmented Lagrange and coordinate descent methods. Furthermore, we show that the aforementioned nnFSG method recovers the oracle estimate consistently, and yields a bound on the mean squared errors (MSE).} Besides, we examine the performance of our method by using finite sample simulations and a real protein mass spectrum dataset. \n \nNext, we consider a High-dimensional multivariate ridge regression model under the regime where both $p$ and $n$ are large enough with $p/n \\rightarrow \\kappa (0<\\kappa<\\infty)$. On top of that, by using a double leave-one-out method, we develop a nonlinear system of two deterministic equations that characterize the behaviour of M-estimate. Meanwhile, the theoretical results have been confirmed by simulations. \n \n Ultimately, we present matching quantiles M-estimation (MQME), a novel method establishing the relationship between the target response variable and the explanatory variables. MQME extends the matching quantiles estimation (MQE) method to a more general one by replacing the ordinary least-squares (OLS) estimation with an M-estimation, the latter being resistant to outlier observations of the target response. In addition, MQME is combined with an adaptive Lasso penalty so it can select informative variables. We also propose an iterative algorithm to compute the MQME estimate, the consistency of which has been proved, as is the MQE. Numerical experiments on simulated and real datasets demonstrate the efficient performance of our method.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.015 | 0.045 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".