A Study on the Integration of the Systems and the Operational Status of the Remarkable Heritage Site (SPR) under the LCAP Law in France: The Case of Parné-sur-Roc
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Protection Sector (SS: Secteur Sauvegarde), the Architectural, Urban and Landscape Protection Area (ZPPAUP: Zone de Protection du Patrimoine Architectural, Urbain et Paysager) and the Area of Valorisation of Architecture and Heritage (AVAP: Aire de Mise en Valeur de l'Architecture et du Patrimoine), which form the basis of the French historic environmental conservation system, were integrated into the Remarkable Heritage Site (SPR: Site Patrimonial Remarquable) system by the Law on the Freedom of Creation, Architecture and Heritage (LCAP Law: Loi relative à la Liberté de la Création, à l'Architecture et au Patrimoine) of July 7, 2016. The purpose of this study is to clarify the characteristics of the SPR system from the perspective of the integration of the systems and to verify the actual operational status of the SPR. As a research method, I used Légifrance to examine the text of the LCAP Law and the Heritage Code and clarified the characteristics of the SPR. As for the Parné-sur-Roc case study, I obtained and analyzed administrative documents from the Laval agglomeration Website to clarify the process, the content and the actual operational status of the Plan for the Promotion of Architecture and Heritage (PVAP: Plan de Valorisation de l'Architecture et du Patrimoine) in the SPR. As a result, in the SPR, it became clear that a framework for cooperation between the national government and local municipalities has taken shape through consultation with the Local Commission of the Remarkable Heritage Site (CLSPR: Commission Locale du Site Patrimonial Remarquable) by the integration of the systems. Public Inquiry is also explicitly stated in the legal text, which also stipulates public participation on the national and local cooperation. In conclusion, although the framework of nationallocal collaboration and public participation in France's historic environmental conservation system is a historically new initiative, the case studies reveal a situation in which it is working well.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".