MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7015359147

In Situ Re-Os Dating of Molybdenite Using La-Icp-Ms/Ms. Analytical protocol and standardization.

2019· other· en· W7015359147 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueGothenburg University Publications Electronic Archive (Gothenburg University) · 2019
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMolybdeniteCalibrationIn situSulfideRadiometric datingDensitometer
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dating with the Re-Os isotopic system provides several advantages compared to conventional\nchronometers such as Rb-Sr. Because of the sidero- and chalcophilic nature of Re and Os, those\ncan be found as trace elements in sulfides, meaning that ages can be obtained for sulfide deposit,\ngiving valuable information of ore genesis. To ensure the quality of the analytical measurements\nneeded in isotopic dating, a reference material with known concentrations of Re and Os is\nnecessary. The aim of this study is to develop a method to produce a homogenous tablet of the\nsulfide molybdenite, and validate its use as a reference material for calibration of in situ Re-Os\ndating using LA-ICP-MS/MS. Molybdenite from Kingsgate, Australia, was used as a test\nmaterial, molybdenite from Moly Hill, Canada, as the reference material for the tablet, and\nmolybdenite from Ytterby, Sweden, as a validation of the produced tablet. The molybdenite\nwas milled by hand with ethanol in an agate mortar and pressed into a tablet in a tablet die set\nby applying 2.5 t (0.19 × 106 kPa) for 2 min. Molybdenite proved to be hard to mill due to its\nlayered structure and milling in a high power planetary ball mill was therefore unsuccessful in\nproducing fine material. The optimum pressure and corresponding time depended on several\nfactors, such as the tablet die set and material, and will affect for example numbers of cracks in\nthe tablet. The tablet was analyzed with LA-ICP-MS/MS, an analytical method that was chosen\nbecause it provides the opportunity to target specific ions, created after a reaction with a reaction\ngas, in this case CH4. This is a tool used to chemically separate the parent and daughter isotopes\nand overcome the isobaric overlap. Isotopes of Re and Os, as well as potential elements in\ninclusion, was measured. Despite signs of inclusions in the final tablets, the Re and Os signals\nseemed unaffected by this. Ratios for 187Re/187Os was calculated for the tablet of molybdenite\nfrom Moly Hill, and for Ytterby molybdenite. The literature Re-Os age for Moly Hill, 2646 Ma,\nwas used to obtain a corresponding 187Re/187Os ratio, which in turn could be used to calculate a\ncorrection factor. This was applied to the Ytterby molybdenite to obtain corrected ratios, then\ncalculating an age of 1823 ± 28 Ma, which overlaps the literature age for Ytterby, 1795 ± 2 Ma.\nThe results validate the quality of the tablet produced of molybdenite from Moly Hill and\nconfirms that it can be used for calibration of in situ Re-Os dating with LA-ICP-MS/MS, even\nif several improvements of the methods can be done in the future, both in the milling process\nand the analytical process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.824
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0100.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGothenburg University Publications Electronic Archive (Gothenburg University)French-language works237,207