SIKAP GURU SD MUHAMMADIYAH KLECO DALAM MENGATASI QUARTER LIFE CRISIS PADA MASA PERKEMBANGAN DEWASA AWAL
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Teachers are professional educators who play a role in the success of students in schools who can fulfill educational goals. Quarter life crisis is the phase of individuals entering their 20s. Individuals who are in this phase often experience various problems such as feeling anxious about the future, indecisive in making decisions, comparing self-achievement with others, feeling unsure of their own abilities, depressed because of demands from the surrounding environment, especially the work environment. This study aims to find out how teachers' attitudes and methods minimize quarter life crises in early adulthood, and to find out whether quarter life crises have an impact on teachers' teaching motivation at Kleco Muhammadiyah Elementary School. Formulation of the problem: 1) What is the attitude of SD Muhammadiyah Kleco teachers when experiencing a quarter life crisis during early adult development?; 2) What are the implications of the quarter life crisis for Kleco Muhammadiyah Elementary School teachers? \nThe method used is qualitative with a phenomenological approach focusing on teacher behavior in minimizing quarter life crises in early adulthood. The research subjects consisted of 5 female teachers at SD Muhammadiyah Kleco aged 25-40 years and were divided into two categories: married and unmarried individuals. Data was collected using observation, interviews, and documentation. \nThe results showed that the teacher's attitude when experiencing a quarter life crisis was confusion with the additional assignments given, income that did not meet expectations, comparing self-achievement, a supportive work environment affecting the teacher's work, anxiety about relationships and friendships, feeling pressured by the many tasks work, and expectations from the family. The implications of the quarter life crisis for Kleco Muhammadiyah Elementary School teachers are by understanding themselves, learning to deal with various responses to given expectations, starting to recognize themselves, knowing their strengths and weaknesses, being careful in making decisions, and having a professional attitude
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.011 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".