MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7015458029

Searching for Planets and Moons Using Gravitational Dynamics

2025· article· en· W7015458029 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueScholarship@Western (Western University) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExoplanetPlanetEphemerisTransit (satellite)Orbital elementsOuter planetsStarsLight curveGravitation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The search for planets around stars other than our Sun, known as "exoplanets", has made use of a variety of different methods. Some methods look for the planet itself through direct imaging. Other techniques search for the signature of planets in the light from its parent star. Such indicators of a planet include the dimming of the star as the planet passes in front of it (the Transit method) or the discrepancy in events that occur from the influence of unseen planets (the Transit Timing Variation method). These techniques allow the discovery of worlds not otherwise visible to telescopes, through the orbital dynamics of known worlds. This work pursues the premise of detecting hidden celestial bodies through their effect upon visible ones. In the first chapter, I examine the usefulness of the Canadian space telescope, the Near Earth Object Surveillance Satellite (NEOSSat), as a tool for exoplanetary science. I performe follow-up observations of several targets from the Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS). These observations improve the orbital ephemerides and baselines for these ex- oplanets, as well as demonstrate the capabilities of NEOSSat as a tool for exoplanetary science. In the second chapter, I examine whether moons around exoplanets ("exomoons") could be detected via the transit timing variations they exert upon their planet. Exomoons are exceptionally difficult to detect via transits, but an exomoon could reveal itself through the gravitational effect it has upon on its parent planet. Thirteen Kepler systems are explored to determine whether this hypothesis could hold. The observed behaviour of eight systems is consistent with the presence of an exomoon, though this is insufficient to confirm the existence of a moon. In the third chapter, I examine the debris disk around HD 181327. It shows a significant asymmetry in its surface brightness profile when viewed in visible light. By performing N-body simulations, I find that a 2-5 Jupiter-mass planet on a circular orbit at 62 au could produce and maintain a similar feature to that observed. Gravity is the universal architect of planetary systems. The existence of a hidden celestial body can be betrayed by its gravitational influence upon another. In this thesis, I explore new ways of using gravity in this vein.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.051

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScholarship@Western (Western University)→Same topicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies→French-language works237,207→