MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7015525781

Spontaneous DNA Extracellular Trap Formation and Th2-biased Immune Responses in Cystic Fibrosis-like Airways of Mice with Lung-specific Nedd4-2 Ubiquitin Ligase Deletion

2014· dissertation· en· W7015525781 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2014
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicNeutrophil, Myeloperoxidase and Oxidative Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of TorontoCystic Fibrosis Canada
KeywordsNeutrophil extracellular trapsCystic fibrosisImmune systemExtracellularLungInflammationFibrosisUbiquitin ligase
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Extracellular DNA exerts major pathological effects in cystic fibrosis (CF) airways. However, the cause for increased DNA and the contribution of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) in cystic fibrosis (CF) airways is uncertain. Additionally, suitable mouse models to study CF lung disease are lacking. We investigated the inflammatory profile and the presence of NETs in a novel mouse model with cystic fibrosis-like lung disease (Nedd4L lung-specific knockout; NL-KO). Our studies show that NL-KO mice have a Th2-biased background inflammation, spontaneous leukocyte infiltration and NET formation in their airways. Overall, inflammatory changes in NL-KO mouse airways occur age-dependently and spontaneously in the absence of detectable infection. Furthermore, NL-KO mice challenged with LPS and P. aeruginosa have an exacerbated inflammatory profile and impaired bacterial clearance, respectively. In conclusion, we show the relevance of NL-KO mouse model to study inflammation, infection, and the role of NETs in CF-like lung disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace→Same topicNeutrophil, Myeloperoxidase and Oxidative Mechanisms→French-language works237,207→