Thunderbird Women. \nIndigenous women reclaiming autonomy through stories of resistance
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract\nIndigenous gender roles have been altered by colonialism through both institutionalized patriarchy and the loss of matrilineal cultural traditions. In Canada, the introduction of the Indian Act and other culturally restrictive laws has had particular impact on Indigenous gender relations. In spite of this, Indigenous women are stepping forward to address the limits and damages of repeating cycles of patriarchy in Indigenous institutions. Research and work done by Indigenous women reflects upon Indigenous feminism and the agency of Indigenous women in their communities. In Saskatchewan Canada or Treaty 4 land, where this research is geographically situated, Indigenous women have a long history of agency through storytelling, such as Maria Campbell, Lee Maracle, and Leanne Simpson. The name of this thesis, and the inspiration to create more space for Indigenous women’s stories, is the Indigenous myth of Thunderbird Woman, who represents female strength and creation. Thunderbird Woman is a woman who falls in love with a Thunderbird and they get married. She lays eggs made of stone, and the myth states that one day the baby Thunderbirds will hatch and save the world. \nThis thesis investigates the significance in supporting Indigenous women’s voices and the benefit of providing space for storytelling in research methodologies. As such, it reflects upon defining feminisms and maintaining space for Indigenous agency in knowledge production and cultural identity, using autoethnography as part of an Indigenous methodology. My methodology is built upon listening, participating and communicating, in addition to observation and document analysis among and together with Indigenous women in Saskatchewan. The teachings of the Cree medicine wheel (the four directions) inform the Indigenous research paradigm I have designed and use here. My version of the research paradigm includes Indigenous feminist perspectives in Saskatchewan and how they create space for Indigenous women to positively impact their communities through leadership, education and reclaiming cultural traditions. \nThe women I spoke with possess a vast amount of knowledge and knowing. In this respect, speaking to these women reminded me of my role as student and as someone seeking knowledge. As Linda T. Smith explains, “indigenous research is a humble and humbling activity” (L. T. Smith 2012, 5). These words are a constant reminder of the importance of reflecting, as well as researching. As we as Indigenous peoples become more confident in reclaiming our identities and cultures, we need more community-based definitions of Indigenous feminism and indigenizing knowledge production.\nKeywords: Indigenous women, storytelling, Indian Act, Canada, Indigenous methodology, colonial patriarchy, reclaiming, identity
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.024 | 0.021 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.011 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".