MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7015601809

T.U.R.F. (Transformative Urban Rooftop Farming): Alleviating Food Insecurity in Toronto

2021· dissertation· en· W7015601809 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUWSpace (University of Waterloo) · 2021
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicUrban Agriculture and Sustainability
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUrban agricultureFood securityFood systemsAgricultureFood insecurityPopulation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One in every eight Canadian households is food insecure. This accounts for 12.7% of the total population of Canada. Food insecurity, which refers to inadequate and insecure access to food due to social, physical, and economic constraints, has a severe effect on an individual’s health and well-being. The city of Toronto has many neighborhoods that face food insecurity within their communities. The city also has an abundance of vacant rooftop space that does not compete with other urban uses. How can urban agriculture on these vacant rooftops help in solving the problems of food insecurity in these vulnerable neighborhoods? Current urban agriculture practices in Toronto are limited to seasonal community farms aimed to feed a handful of the population and focus on enriching the community. However, research dictates that rooftops can be used for food production using the principles and technologies of building integrated agriculture (BIA). But little research is available to discuss how urban agriculture on a building can aid the food insecure population of the city. BIA on underutilized rooftops across the food insecure neighborhoods in the city of Toronto can act as an agent to alleviate the challenge of food insecurity. This research involves analyzing existing buildings in dense urban environments that have incorporated BIAs and understanding the different farming systems used by these buildings. Neighborhoods in Toronto that suffer from food insecurity are treated as test sites for implementing the researched BIA systems. The BIA proposal also aims to track the changes in the day-to-day life of the building residents. Integration of BIA within the city is beneficial for the people, the urban environment, and climate change in general. This local production of food will not only contribute towards alleviating food insecurity but also bring people closer to food production and reduce the impacts of food production on the climate by reducing food miles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.954
Threshold uncertainty score0.145

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0100.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUWSpace (University of Waterloo)Same topicUrban Agriculture and SustainabilityFrench-language works237,207