MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7015743643

Surface seakeeping experiments with a model of a submarine

2010· article· en· W7015743643 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueNPARC · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicShip Hydrodynamics and Maneuverability
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSeakeepingSubmarineDeckHullRange (aeronautics)MooringPropulsionPropellerSlammingScale model
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Model experiments to investigate the surface performance of the Canadian Victoria Class submarine, under various environmental and operational conditions, were carried out at the Institute for Ocean Technology of the National Research Council, Canada. The task was initiated by the Canadian Navy in the wake of the HMCS Chicoutimi fi re-at-sea on the recommendation of a Naval Board of Inquiry. The program included systematic experiments to evaluate the seakeeping behaviour of the submarine in environmental and operational conditions selected to support development of guidelines for submarine operators. This included experiments in irregular waves and regular waves, along with roll decay tests. Environmental and operational variables covered of range of speeds, sea states and vessel headings. A free running, self-propelled, autopilot-driven, radio controlled model was designed and built to a scale of 1:14.96. The model, suitable for surface operations only, was outfi tted with active rudders, fi xed forward and after planes, main sail and keel. The model was designed so that the space between the outer body and the pressure hull was subjected to fl ooding and limited free fl ow. The external geometry of the model did not include acoustic tiles present on the fullscale boat. The model was instrumented to measure model motions, speed and propeller revolutions, and to monitor presence of water on deck in selected locations. Measurements of the roll responses were the principal targets of the project investigation. This paper presents a description of the model, its particulars, including the evolution of the design process. Experimental results including roll, pitch and heave responses in regular and irregular waves, and roll decay results are presented. All model information and results meet ITTC requirements for benchmark data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.802
Threshold uncertainty score0.277

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNPARCSame topicShip Hydrodynamics and ManeuverabilityFrench-language works237,207