TRAINING AND DEPLOYMENT OF TROOPS (FORCES) DURING SEA EVACUATION OF OPPOSING PARTIES IN MILITARY CONFLICTS OF THE XX – FIRST QUARTER OF THE XXI CENTURY
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the conditions of full-scale aggression of the Russian Federation against Ukraine, an important component of the state’s defense remains its defense at sea. Today, the Naval Forces of the Armed Forces of Ukraine continue to participate in repelling the armed aggression of the Russian Federation, interacting with other types of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, therefore the study of issues of training and use of naval forces in inter-species operations (actions) in the maritime direction are relevant today. Such operations (actions) include the evacuation of troops (forces) by sea. In this context, the accumulated experience of evacuating troops (forces) by sea in military conflicts of the 20th – the first quarter of the 21st century, in particular, the preparation and use of troops (forces) in such operations (actions), is of great importance. Having analyzed the works of domestic and foreign researchers on the history of naval art in the military conflicts of the 20th – the first quarter of the 21st century, the author established that the study of this issue was not the subject of a comprehensive, thorough and objective military-historical study. Thus, the mentioned issue has both practical and military-scientific interest. The article provides a comparative analysis of the preparation and use of troops (forces) during sea evacuation of opposing parties in military conflicts of the 20th – the first quarter of the 21st century. The characteristic features and peculiarities of the preparation and use of the troops (forces) of the opposing sides in evacuation measures by sea during the First World War, the Civil War in Russia and the Second World War have been determined. The evacuation of troops (forces) by sea in the inter-war and post-war periods is considered and analyzed fragmentarily. As directions for further research, it is advisable to consider the peculiarities of management, interaction and support in operations (actions) for the evacuation of troops (forces) by sea of opposing parties in military conflicts of the 20th – the first quarter of the 21st century.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".