MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7015861291

Understanding Women Middle Managers’ Realities in Québec’s 
\nHealth and Social Services System

2023· dissertation· en· W7015861291 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueSpectrum Research Repository (Concordia University) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGender Diversity and Inequality
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFocus groupContext (archaeology)Qualitative researchMiddle managementUnpaid workEquity (law)Grounded theoryWork (physics)Public service
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research captures the lived experiences of eight women middle managers in Québec’s Health and Social Service System (HSSS) and makes recommendations for changes that will support them in their multiple roles, while fostering their psychological well-being. A qualitative inquiry research approach was used to study how women middle managers navigate their professional and private roles, in a public organization where women comprise the majority of the employees and middle managers. Additionally, it explores the opportunities and barriers that these women face in a context where family-friendly policies such as parental leave, affordable daycare, and pay equity have existed for over two decades. \nAll study participants were white French-Canadian mothers, except one who was a mother-to-be. The research revealed that they felt overextended and that the superwoman syndrome is still alive and well, reinforced by unrealistic organizational and societal expectations grounded in the gendered segregation of both paid and unpaid work. Although these women were highly educated, they still followed the societal norms concerning their domestic, caregiver, and emotional roles, trying to adapt and “do it all” at the expense of their own health and psychological well-being. \nThe implications of this study show that persistent gender segregation in paid and unpaid work spheres leaves women and mothers squeezed for time which negatively impacts their well-being. This study calls for changes in the organizational culture and a move away from a work-centric focus to a focus on human capital. It also has important implications for governments as their policies and practices contribute to work environments which are maladapted to women’s and especially mothers’ realities. If true progress is to be made, society must value caregiving and develop policies and practices which allow people to thrive in all spheres of their lives: self, family, and work. We have to stop trying to fix women and rather focus on system change and transformation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.068
Threshold uncertainty score0.493

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0240.008
Scholarly communication0.0060.002
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.193
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.129 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSpectrum Research Repository (Concordia University)Same topicGender Diversity and InequalityFrench-language works237,207