Understanding Women Middle Managers’ Realities in Québec’s \nHealth and Social Services System
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research captures the lived experiences of eight women middle managers in Québec’s Health and Social Service System (HSSS) and makes recommendations for changes that will support them in their multiple roles, while fostering their psychological well-being. A qualitative inquiry research approach was used to study how women middle managers navigate their professional and private roles, in a public organization where women comprise the majority of the employees and middle managers. Additionally, it explores the opportunities and barriers that these women face in a context where family-friendly policies such as parental leave, affordable daycare, and pay equity have existed for over two decades. \nAll study participants were white French-Canadian mothers, except one who was a mother-to-be. The research revealed that they felt overextended and that the superwoman syndrome is still alive and well, reinforced by unrealistic organizational and societal expectations grounded in the gendered segregation of both paid and unpaid work. Although these women were highly educated, they still followed the societal norms concerning their domestic, caregiver, and emotional roles, trying to adapt and “do it all” at the expense of their own health and psychological well-being. \nThe implications of this study show that persistent gender segregation in paid and unpaid work spheres leaves women and mothers squeezed for time which negatively impacts their well-being. This study calls for changes in the organizational culture and a move away from a work-centric focus to a focus on human capital. It also has important implications for governments as their policies and practices contribute to work environments which are maladapted to women’s and especially mothers’ realities. If true progress is to be made, society must value caregiving and develop policies and practices which allow people to thrive in all spheres of their lives: self, family, and work. We have to stop trying to fix women and rather focus on system change and transformation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.024 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".