Through the eyes of "The Guardian" newspaper : Securitization and humanitarian discourses and the arrival of Hungarian (1956-1957) and Kosovar refugees (1999) on Prince Edward Island, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study was conceptualized from the author‟s experiences while he was completing the\nCanada Exchanges with the Mediterranean: Migration Experiences and their impact on\nNationalism, Trans-nationalism and Identity (CEMMENTI) exchange with the University of\nMalta in 2008. While completing the program, the author was enrolled in a Contemporary\nMigrations course through the European Research and Documentation Centre and also\nvolunteered at Marsa Open Refugee Centre. The powerful role that the media has in shaping the\nopinions Maltese have towards refugees was identified in the Migrations course and also through\nthe author‟s personal experiences at Marsa Centre. Based on this premise that the media has a\nrole in affecting the reception experiences of refugees, this research examines sets of articles\nfrom Prince Edward Island‟s The Guardian newspaper which focused on refugee arrivals during\nthe 1950s, 1980s, and 1990s. The 1950s articles demonstrate that the arrival of Hungarian\nrefugees to the Island was welcomed by residents. This is contrasted by the 1990s articles which\ndemonstrate that apprehension existed among residents impending the arrival of Kosovar\nrefugees to the Island. The articles from the 1980s discuss two discourses: a discourse which\nsecuritizes refugees and a discourse which reaffirms humanitarianism among residents of the\nhost community.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".