Viaggio ad occhi chiusi: prime riflessioni sul prodotto turistico \naccessibile a tutti nella prospettiva economico-aziendale
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In questo vasto argomento circoscriveremo l’attenzione ad \nuna parte della sostenibilità(Rapporto Brundtland, 1997; Bebbington, \n2007) che riguarda la sua declinazione in termini di turismo \nsostenibile( Confalonieri, 2008; Baldarelli 2011) ed \nall’interno dello stesso del turismo sociale che, da tempo, cerca \ndi tenere conto della giustizia sociale per dare la possibilità a \ntutti di usufruire di questo diritto, che è stato sancito e deve essere \nsoddisfatto nella misura più ampia possibile2. \nUna ulteriore definizione del termine sociale riferito al turismo, \nderiva dall’articolo 13 della dichiarazione di Montreal del \n1996, che così afferma: “il termine “sociale” significa maggiore \nsolidarietà, fratellanza e speranza per tutte quelle persone nel \nmondo – e sono tante – che ancora sono in attesa di poter godere \ndel tempo libero”.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.013 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".