การดำรงอยและการปฏสมพนธทางวฒนธรรมของชมชนมสลมภายใตพหสงคมเมองสงขลา
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The study on the Existence and Interaction of Muslim Community Culture in the Plurality Society of Muang Songkhla is a qualitative research aimed to investigate three Muslim communities with long historical backgrounds, namely: Hua Khao Daeng, Laem Son, and Ban Bon communities in three aspects: their existence, factors contributing their coexistence, and interactions among Muslims, Thais, and Chinese Thais.From the study, it was found that during 1945-1961, public utilities in Hua Khao Daeng and Laem Son had characteristics of a rural communities were not yet developed and the communities while Ban Bon which was an urban community was developed in various aspects.The population of Hua Khao Daeng and Laem Son communities was therefore not dense with Muslims who had originally been in the areas as a majority.Their houses were in clusters and their occupation was originally fishery.For Ban Bon community, most Muslims migrated from Laem Son and Hua Khao Daeng communities and thus they were relatives.People living in Ban Bon community had many different occupations in addition to fishery.Some of them were in trading and had traded with people in the group and with those in other groups.The important factors for the coexistence of these three communities were: they had the same religion and were related to each other since their ancestors encouraging them to help each other.Hua Khao Daeng and Laem Son communities showed their culture more clearly than Ban Bon community from the way they dressed, the names they carried because they had less relationship with other groups when compared with Ban Bon community.The cultural ways of living of Muslims in Ban Bon did not show outstanding identities.As a result, their reactions did not make people feel much of the differences between Muslims, Thais and Chinese Thais who lived
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".