MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7016736548

從文化資產保存角度探討百年來台灣棒球書籍出版概況

2007· other· zh· W7016736548 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languagezh
FieldComputer Science
TopicLibrary Science and Information Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIdentification (biology)Work (physics)Process (computing)Relation (database)Context (archaeology)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

資訊傳播科技的快速發展帶來許多新的資料類型,而資料類型標示(General Materials Designations '簡稱GMD) 的著錄、呈現樣式及檢索功能更成為數位時代編目規則的熱門議題。1997 年在Toronto 舉辦的英美編目規則原則及未來發展的國際性會議(Intemational Conference on the Principles and Future Development of AACR) 中, Tom Delsey 指出GMD 在分類邏輯上的不一致性,各種資料類型標示 的特定性並非處於同一等紋,參雜混合資料內容及載體的類型描述。Toronto 會議引發各界對傳統GMD 的重新檢視及AACR2R 規則0 .24 的修訂。2006 年,取代AACR 的新內容標準RDA(Resource Access and Description) 草案對GMD 有相當大幅度的修改,推出全新的資訊資源、分類絮構。筆者研讀相關文獻,試從GMD的歷史發展探討資訊資源類型標示的分類及其未來。結語指出或許新的資訊資源分類方式比舊版規則更合乎邏輯,但是不夠明確簡易。從各界對RDA 相關規則(3.2 ,4.2) 的評論,可見離新規則的使用還有一段很長的路要走。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.264
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.004
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0430.110

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLibrary Science and Information SystemsFrench-language works237,207