Adolescence : la fabrique des héros : une socio-anthropologie du dispositif "Avoir 20 ans en 2015", projet mené par Wajdi Mouawad dans le cadre de Mons, Capitale Européenne de la Culture
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In January 2011, internationally renowned artist and director Wajdi Mouawad, who was involved in Mons 2015 and its year as European Capital of Culture, came up with an unprecedented project aimed at fifty teenagers from Belgium, France and Canada: between the ages of fifteen and twenty, they were given the chance to spend one week a year travelling around the world, visiting theatres in their home towns, and asking themselves some “burning questions” about adolescence, with a view to “learning to think for themselves”. The researcher has spent five years with them, observing the experience in order to take a close-up, in-depth look at the process organised by the artist, finding out how the twenty Belgian teenagers involved in the project got on and what they talked about. The comprehensive analysis of this “adventure” produced by the researcher is based on the notion of challenge (challenging yourself, others, school your family and society). Among other things, the researcher carried out an ethnographic observation of five trips (2011-2015) and developed a comprehensive, inductive and original approach, filming one-to-one interviews each year (2011-2017), which form the substance of 20 documentary portraits and a film that brings this odyssey to an end. Using a range of different approaches and disciplines, the researcher has adopted a method based on listening and talking to produce a reflective, collaborative end product with the 20 subjects. The project fits in perfectly with information and communication sciences, contributing to the body of theory for these fields.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".