Absent and Present: The Mental Health and Wellness of Ontario Teacher Leaders Using a Catholic Social Justice Approach
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract\nThe purpose of this Organizational Improvement Plan (OIP) is to present a Problem of Practice (PoP) at Trinity Forever Catholic School (pseudonym: TFCS). This is the limited focus on teacher-leader mental health and wellness (MhW) stemming from a lack of resource organization by school and board leadership levels. Current MhW resources are not focussed on the health and well-being of educators. It is necessary to navigate resources that minister to the common good and dignity of all teacher-leaders. This exercise is important to the work of a teacher-leader who is serving TFCS under long-standing conditions that impair MhW. Catholic principles of social justice viewed through Gregory Baum’s critical theological lens is featured. A Christian view of critical theory will provide further support. A multi-faceted frame scrutinizes the status quo at TFCS and stays faithful to the Catholic mission and vision of the organization. Through iteration of the guiding questions, authentic-servant leadership coupled with Ai and theological reflection demonstrate what is good and positive at TFCS and begin a transformation by placing teacher-leader MhW in full view of the school community. The change model being employed is AKDAR (Hiatt, 1996; Hiatt & Creasey, 2012), to affect the elimination of the PoP. Teacher-leader MhW needs an equitable place in education discourse, beginning at the school level, and perhaps proceeding to the board level and faith-based conferences, to reach more teacher-leaders in wider contexts. Valuable knowledge can be shared through communities of practice. Teacher-targeted MhW resources need to be discoursed on a regular basis.\nKeywords: Educational leadership, elementary school, critical theology, Catholic social justice, teacher wellness, ADKAR
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".