MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7017190999

An adversarially robust multi-view multi-kernel framework for IoT malware threat hunting

2023· dissertation· en· W7017190999 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Atrium (University of Guelph) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Malware Detection Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMitacsOntario Centre of InnovationUniversity of Guelph
KeywordsMalwareAdversarial systemExploitBackdoorCryptovirologyBotnetThreat modelTask (project management)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Increasingly complex cyber threats are resulting in significant losses of social, political, and financial resources. One of the major cyber threats is malware attacks, which can target various platforms ranging from computer devices to critical infrastructure. With the rise of the Internet of Things (IoT), there are both promising prospects and security challenges. However, IoT systems are facing more security challenges than ever before due to their diversified and numerous applications. Malware remains one of the primary tools that cybercriminals use to infect and exploit IoT devices.
\n
\nDetecting malware threats, also known as threat hunting, is a complicated task that requires security analysts to design a robust security posture against attackers' tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs). However, timely threat hunting is difficult as security mechanisms face new malicious payloads that do not have a single behavior. Moreover, threat actors use evading techniques such as generating adversarial examples to bypass artificial intelligence (AI)-powered defensive mechanisms.
\n
\nTo address these challenges, this research proposes an adversarial robust multi-view multi-kernel malware threat hunting framework for IoT environments. The framework consists of three elements: a multi-kernel IoT malware threat hunting module, a malware example generative module based on code-cave vulnerability, and an adversarial malware example prevention module based on statistical bytecode analysis.
\n
\nThe multi-kernel approach uses an aggregation function to detect malicious payloads from a different view, including bytecodes and opcodes. The generative model attempts to bypass deep neural network models using adversarial techniques such as code caves. Finally, the prevention mechanism detects adversarial examples based on their feature spaces and an ensemble structure for deciding whether incoming samples are adversarially generated or not.
\n
\nTo evaluate the proposed framework, Precision, Recall, and Confidence Interval metrics are used to assess its accuracy in hunting malware samples. Additionally, an evasion rate metric is used to assess the robustness of the machine learning-based threat-hunting model against adversarial examples. The framework is tested using an IoT cloud-edge malware dataset. This research contributes to the development of a robust malware threat-hunting framework that can detect IoT malware threats while mitigating adversarial attacks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.624
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0030.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Atrium (University of Guelph)Same topicAdvanced Malware Detection TechniquesFrench-language works237,207