MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7017193545

“An Afternoon with afternoon: A Live Group Traversal & Conversation Celebrating the 30th Anniversary of Michael Joyce’s afternoon: a story”

2020· article· en· W7017193545 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicDigital Humanities and Scholarship
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHypertextConversationEvent (particle physics)PostmodernismRansomAdventureThe artsNewspaper
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This event is a live group Traversal celebrating the 30th anniversary of Michael Joyce’s hypertext novel, afternoon: a story.\nDemonstrated in 1987 at the ACM Hypertext conference and published by Eastgate Systems, Inc. in 1990, this seminal work is considered by critic Robert Coover to be the “granddaddy of full-length hypertext fictions” and, so, helped to lay the foundation of electronic literature for years to come. It has been published in five languages and is one of two original Eastgate works, along with Shelley Jackson’s Patchwork Girl, made available for contemporary computers. It is also one of two works, along with J Yellowlees Douglas’ “I Have Said Nothing” (1994), that was published in a print literary anthology––W. W. Norton & Co.’s Postmodern American Fiction (1997). Archives of the work and Joyce’s papers have been collected by the Harry Ransom Center.\nPerforming afternoon: a story will be scholars and artists who have impacted the work through reviews, translations, archival activities, and scholarly writing. They include:\nN. Katherine HaylesJane Yellowlees DouglasStuart MoulthropJohn McDaidWalter VanniniMariusz PisarskiArnaud RegnauldMaria EngbergMatt Kirschenbaum Heather Malin\nDene Grigar will moderate and Astrid Ensslin will serve as Chat Archivist.\nThe event will take place over Zoom and will be managed by researchers and technical specialists at the Electronic Literature Lab at Washington State University Vancouver. Following the performance, Joyce will participate in a conversation with Dene Grigar, Director of ELL, about the work, its development, and its place in literary history.\nAn archive of the event will be made available to the public as both video documentation on Vimeo and a podcast on Soundcloud.\nWe request that the event be scheduled on Wednesday, July 15, between the ELO and Hypertext conferences in order to reach audiences from both organizations.\nTo register for and attend this event, go to: https://wsu.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_gl6ObUKfSBebqeyiFYewnA

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.207
Threshold uncertainty score0.777

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of International Crisis and Risk Communication ResearchSame topicDigital Humanities and ScholarshipFrench-language works237,207