MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7017210310

Algebraic Enhancements for Systolic Arrays

2024· dissertation· en· W7017210310 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMacSphere (McMaster University) · 2024
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicParallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMcMaster University
KeywordsDeep learningWorkloadField (mathematics)Systolic arrayPoint (geometry)InferenceClass (philosophy)Algebraic numberRange (aeronautics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The field of deep learning has seen increasing breakthroughs and commercial adoption in recent years for enabling a wide range of applications including image and speech recognition, multimedia generation, information summarization, and human-like chatbots. This has led to a growing need for hardware that can quickly and efficiently perform deep learning inference, which increasingly requires massive amounts of computational power. To address this need, recent years have seen many works for optimizing deep learning inference in hardware. Systolic arrays are an efficient class of hardware designs to use as a starting point for this application. However, after hardware-oriented deep learning model optimizations reach their limits, after the known parallelism for executing their compute patterns in hardware is exhausted, and after technology scaling slows to a halt, there is an accelerator wall that limits further improvement on the implementation side. In this thesis, we contribute to this field through an under-explored direction by presenting new efficient matrix multiplication algorithms and/or their systolic-array hardware architectures that increase performance-per-area by reducing the workload at the algebraic level, and thus by computing the same result from a re-arranged compute pattern requiring fewer or cheaper operations to be performed in hardware. We evaluate our architectures in an end-to-end deep learning accelerator, demonstrating their ability to increase the performance-per-area of hardware accelerators beyond their normal theoretical limits.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.056

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacSphere (McMaster University)Same topicParallel Computing and Optimization TechniquesFrench-language works237,207