Altérités : revue d'anthropologie du contemporain ; vol. 8, no 1, décembre 2011, Les paradoxes de la valeur
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La valeur et son calcul. Introduction et présentation du numéro / Suzanne Beth (Université de Montréal), Léa Kalaora (Université de Montréal) et Anne Lardeux (Université de Montréal) ; Prendre soin de la valeur. Un entretien avec Bernard Stiegler / Anne Lardeux (Université de Montréal) ; Problème de la valeur et critique de la consommation capitaliste : objectivation et fabrication des subjectivités dans le capitalisme avancé / Renaud Picard (Université Paris VIII) ; Mise en valeur, conversions et reconversions monétaires : les cycles des travailleurs agricoles saisonniers étrangers au Québec / Jorge Pantaleon (Université de Montréal) ; Le prix : retour sur des vérités de base. Un entretien avec Paul Jorion / Anne Lardeux (Université de Montréal) ; Mesure et valeur comptables et financières / Christophe Beth (Expert comptable) ; C’est bien de valeur, mais… Portrait d’un pawn shop montréalais / Kim Turcot-DiFruscia (Université de Montréal) ; Valoir le clou. Une histoire lacunaire de l'accrochage / Clément de Gaulejac (Université du Québec à Montréal) ; Exporter Sunflower Seeds : la valeur paradoxale d’une oeuvre d’Ai Weiwei / Marc-Alexandre Reinhardt (Université de Montréal) ; “That’s how you win elections”: Electoral Transactions, Political Consultancy and the Personalization of Politics in Colombia’s Democratic Reform / Maria Vidart (Rice University) ; Occupation [extérieur nuit] / Hermine Ortega (Occupy Everywhere)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".